Joern,
> if you really do, e.g. for creating ultrasonics,
Running at 192 or 96 kHz gives the theoretical bandwidth, yes, but they
are *audio* converters. There are not many chips that convert the
theoretically possible bandwidth. The M16 e.g. does only 50kHz at 192kHz
and 34kHz at 96kHz.
I once had a couple of very disappointed bat biologists who wanted to
use the M32AD :)
> then the only solution
> that comes to mind is an rme hdspm plus a pricey converter for 96 or
> even 192 khz, such as two adi-qs or an m16.
Way too expensive. There are 32ch converters on the market for a quarter
of that price.
Flo
-- Machines can do the work, so people have time to think. public key B3B9226C _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Thu May 16 00:15:02 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu May 16 2013 - 00:15:02 EEST