Re: [LAU] RME Multiface and an extra 8 output channels

"Way too expensive. There are 32ch converters on the market for a quarter
of that price."

But man, does it sound amazing! I've currently got one ADI8-QS and as soon
as I can afford it, I'll be getting another. Expensive, but yummy!

--Jason
www.artcitysound.com
On May 15, 2013 1:12 PM, "Florian Faber" <faber@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> Joern,
>
> > if you really do, e.g. for creating ultrasonics,
>
> Running at 192 or 96 kHz gives the theoretical bandwidth, yes, but they
> are *audio* converters. There are not many chips that convert the
> theoretically possible bandwidth. The M16 e.g. does only 50kHz at 192kHz
> and 34kHz at 96kHz.
>
> I once had a couple of very disappointed bat biologists who wanted to
> use the M32AD :)
>
> > then the only solution
> > that comes to mind is an rme hdspm plus a pricey converter for 96 or
> > even 192 khz, such as two adi-qs or an m16.
>
> Way too expensive. There are 32ch converters on the market for a quarter
> of that price.
>
>
> Flo
> --
> Machines can do the work, so people have time to think.
> public key B3B9226C
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu May 16 00:15:02 2013