On 06/05/2013 11:18 PM, Harry van Haaren wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier
> <nettings@email-addr-hidden <mailto:nettings@email-addr-hidden>> wrote:
> > it runs fine at 124x4, haven't tried to push the latency down more,
> but since it only has outputs, what's the point anyways?
>
> Live performance using MIDI input is a use case.. I'd be intrested what
> latencies it can do if you wouldn't mind testing? One of 128 * 2,
> 128 * 3, 64 * 4 or 64 *3 would probably run best... 64 * 2 would
> be amazing for the channel count though :D
>
> On another topic, how would using 2 of these fare for WFS applications?
here be plasma-breathing plutonium dragons with infrared laser eyes.
> It would make the cheapest 16 output channel external soundcard that I
> know of.. but I fear that the non-sample accurate sync would throw off
> source perception?
definitely.
rule of thumb: if you are considering WFS and the price of the
_interface_ is an issue, you don't really want to be doing WFS.
-- Jörn Nettingsmeier Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 177 7937487 Meister für Veranstaltungstechnik (Bühne/Studio) Tonmeister VDT http://stackingdwarves.net _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Thu Jun 6 16:15:02 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 06 2013 - 16:15:02 EEST