Re: [LAU] Linux Audio podcast, episode001

From: Louigi Verona <louigi.verona@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Jul 02 2013 - 22:17:21 EEST

An interesting discussion in the mailing list was at the end of 2012 when I
wrote this article:
http://www.louigiverona.ru/?page=projects&s=writings&t=linux&a=linux_progress

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2012-October/087434.html

Many people say what they think.

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Harry van Haaren <harryhaaren@email-addr-hiddenwrote:

> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona@email-addr-hidden>
> wrote:
> > Just some thoughts to share <snip>
> Nice perspective, informative. I think it would be a great resource to get
> feedback like what you said from a wide range of linux-audio musicians, as
> a kind of "probe" to find the most significant lacking elements. Perhaps
> I'll be told "we know that already", but what harm in confirming our
> suspicions?
> Anybody know how to best gather up such info? (I'm not experienced in that
> kinda thing)
>
> Re workflow, if some type of OSC protocol could be established between a
> synth ("client"/"automate-able") and an automation program
> ("host"/"automater"), twisting the knob on the synth client could inform
> the host which parameter to show in the editor...?
> Perhaps its a bit of a hack, and it would require wide-spread
> implementation to become useful, but it is a *workable* solution. Perhaps
> not the neatest, but I think worth mentioning.
>
>
>

-- 
Louigi Verona
http://www.louigiverona.ru/

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Jul 3 00:15:02 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 03 2013 - 00:15:02 EEST