On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona@email-addr-hidden>
wrote:
> Just some thoughts to share <snip>
Nice perspective, informative. I think it would be a great resource to get
feedback like what you said from a wide range of linux-audio musicians, as
a kind of "probe" to find the most significant lacking elements. Perhaps
I'll be told "we know that already", but what harm in confirming our
suspicions?
Anybody know how to best gather up such info? (I'm not experienced in that
kinda thing)
Re workflow, if some type of OSC protocol could be established between a
synth ("client"/"automate-able") and an automation program
("host"/"automater"), twisting the knob on the synth client could inform
the host which parameter to show in the editor...?
Perhaps its a bit of a hack, and it would require wide-spread
implementation to become useful, but it is a *workable* solution. Perhaps
not the neatest, but I think worth mentioning.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Jul 3 00:15:02 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 03 2013 - 00:15:02 EEST