Re: [LAU] [OT] Debian versions - Was: Re: ardour3 on debian stable

From: <gnome@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Dec 14 2013 - 12:16:09 EET

And I like Debian Sid via Aptosid.

david
gnome@email-addr-hidden
http://dancingtreefrog.com
authenticity, honesty, community

---- Lorenzo Sutton <lorenzofsutton@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On 13/12/2013 09:53, Milan Lazecky wrote:
> > Hi,
> > thank you for information - I was hoping crunchbang was from unstable...
> > I have it on my netbook few days and working well.
> > But anyway, unstable debian should be well prepared system and if you
> > don't have "old iron" (as me) and want to do good stuff, using ardour3
> > etc, I would really recommend you to upgrade into unstable. Living on
> > the edge is the only way to see further, I would say.
>
> IMHO Testing is also a good compromise. But I guess it also depends on
> personal taste.
>
> Lorenzo.
>
>
> >
> > Milan
> >
> >
> > 2013/12/12 Atte <atte@email-addr-hidden <mailto:atte@email-addr-hidden>>
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm runing crunchbang linux, which essentially is debian stable. I'm
> > having trouble getting ardour3 working, tried both the source
> > tarball, checking out from git and the paid-for download from
> > ardour.org <http://ardour.org>. Let's take the later:
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Dec 14 16:15:01 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Dec 14 2013 - 16:15:02 EET