Re: [LAU] Bitwig at long last...?

From: Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Jan 24 2014 - 00:52:12 EET

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Max <abonnements@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> Am 2014년 01월 22일 22:35, schrieb Paul Davis:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Max <abonnements@email-addr-hidden
> > <mailto:abonnements@email-addr-hidden>> wrote:
> >
> > the modular system also teased for the next version is strange too. I
> > wish they'd just incorporate Pd into Bitwig. Who needs Max for
> > Live then.
> >
> >
> > oh sure. "just incorpate" it. one of the biggest engineering efforts
> > in Live's history, and you want them "just" do it.
> >
> > it would be cool, though.
>
> I wasn't suggesting that is is trivial. I was only wondering why they
> want to reinvent the wheel rather than making use of something that is
> already there (and in BSD license). This is the screenshot from their
> site and their patching environment:
>
> http://bitwig.com/dms/bitwig/img/announcement_page/sections/2/native-modular-system.png
>

Maybe for the same reasons that led to Ingen or AlsaModularSynth or Reaktor
or ... ?

And maybe because they want tighter integration than can "easily" be
reached with PD ?

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Jan 24 04:15:04 2014

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 24 2014 - 04:15:04 EET