On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 04:05:40PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> features new versions of software will provide, not to mention that for
> good reasons I prefer Arch over Debian. I'm using both, but the rolling
> release Arch is much more stable, than Debian ...
A rolling release by its very nature is *not* 'stable'. In the Debian
sense, stable does not mean unlikely to crash (although this is a
pleasant side effect) but that it will stay the same on a daily basis
while still keeping the system updated with security patches. It is my
understanding that a rolling release is, by its nature, the complete
opposite.
-- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." --- Malcolm X _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Sun Mar 30 20:15:03 2014
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Mar 30 2014 - 20:15:04 EEST