Re: [LAU] jack2 vs. jack1/zita vs. jack2+zita-a2j, performance differences

From: Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Apr 17 2014 - 12:16:29 EEST

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:23 AM, michael noble <looplog@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hiddenwrote:
>
>> so in those tests using -A SB, the bridge follows the server
>> configuration and adds no latency.
>
>
> Ah, reading the 0.124.0 release notes it also seems that -A SB is
> full-duplex, so perhaps a fair comparison after all?
>

-A SB is full duplex. the final test was done with just zita-j2a which is
just for playback. so not entirely fair. the correct test with jack1 would
be to use

    -I SoundBlaster:zalsa_out/-dhw:SB

which will use the internal zita bridge client for playback only.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Apr 17 16:15:01 2014

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 17 2014 - 16:15:02 EEST