On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 06:38:50AM +0200, hermann meyer wrote:
> >>>The whole part that finds the exact frequency by comparing
> >>>phases is completely redundant. This information is never
> >>>really used. It just looks as if it is used.
>
> That's true, we could leave that part out, that will spare us 0.2%
> dsp load.
You're missing the point. Which is that the frequency info
*should* be used to decide how to map bins to a new frequency.
Also, it's easy to reduce CPU load by letting the whole thing
run at a quarter of the system sample rate. Which means that
for one octave down everything above 3 kHz is gone. But I guess
CPU load was not the only reason for doing that.
Ciao,
-- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Sun Jun 8 16:15:02 2014
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jun 08 2014 - 16:15:02 EEST