[Paul Davis]
>On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Tim Goetze <tim@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> [I have to agree that this is a far more useful approach than jack's
>> current "slow-sync" and I think that for jack to become a truly
>> professional tool the adoption of this state model is inevitable.
>
>ignoring any details of the transport API, there isn't anything that will
>make JACK a "truly professional tool".
I beg your forgiveness for my very poor choice of words, but still I
am hopeful, even certain, that this mistake of mine will not be able
to taint your habitual power of objective consideration telling you
that the current approach is inferior to Fons' proposal in a number of
ways.
Cheers, Tim
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Aug 17 00:15:05 2014
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 17 2014 - 00:15:05 EEST