On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Tim Goetze <tim@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> [I have to agree that this is a far more useful approach than jack's
> current "slow-sync" and I think that for jack to become a truly
> professional tool the adoption of this state model is inevitable.
>
ignoring any details of the transport API, there isn't anything that will
make JACK a "truly professional tool".
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Aug 17 00:15:04 2014
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 17 2014 - 00:15:04 EEST