Re: [LAU] Open Source Audio Interface (was Successor/replacement for RME HDSP+Multiface?)

From: Kazakore <dj_kaza@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Sep 02 2014 - 05:04:41 EEST

> Madi can be sub-ms RT (return trip)

Really? Coax, optical or both? I used MADI routers in my work but that
was more about sharing multi-channel audio across sites miles apart than
low-latency monitoring... (I also have to sadly admit the MADI system is
one of the ones I new the least about by the time I left that job :( )
>
> FOH snake use seems to require ~3ms RT
Sounds like CobraNet at it's lowest latency setting (1.33ms per
direction, plus a little propagation delay.)

I assume people have heard and read up on AES67? I admit I haven't
beyond skimming it and can't say I'm sure whether it's its own
specification or more about getting the various existing solutions to
communicate together. Probably worth reading though...

http://www.aes.org/publications/standards/search.cfm?docID=96

Dale.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Sep 2 08:15:01 2014

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 02 2014 - 08:15:01 EEST