On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 03:58:06PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> portaudio is significantly easier to implement support for. this seems to
> be the main reason it is used. i am working with another well known audio
> software company and when faced with implementing windows support as part
> of their own cross-platform efforts, they decided to use portaudio for
> windows rather than try to code ASIO support directly (they had already
> tamed coreaudio to their satisfaction). it must be possible, but apparently
> aspects of it appear daunting.
If Portaudio handles ASIO as it should be done, then it must contain
all the code required to do this. So all that is needed is to re-use
that while removing whatever unnecessary layers put on top of it.
Ciao,
-- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Sat Sep 27 04:15:02 2014
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Sep 27 2014 - 04:15:03 EEST