On 11/02/2014 03:21 PM, Simon Wise wrote:
> On 03/11/14 11:45, Len Ovens wrote:
>> On Sun, 2 Nov 2014, david wrote:
>
>>> I like feeling a real knob or slider, not the flat slick surface of a
>>> picture
>>> of a knob or slider.
>>
>> I think there is no one here who wants "touch" for controlling audio.
>> We all
>> want something we can feel that we don't have to watch. Watching while
>> moving
>> takes more concerntration leaving less for listening, but listening is
>> more
>> important. Worse (I don't know about others) the concentration used
>> with a touch
>> pad to make sure my finger is in the right place is fully on the upper
>> level of
>> my consiousness as opposed to a knob or fader that becomes an
>> extension of low
>> level muscle control for the most part.
>
> it is the combination of real knobs and faders with the visual feed back
> of a touch screen for selecting and viewing things that works well ...
> it has been the basis of some very high end studio mixing systems for a
> while now. A biggish button displayed on a touchsceen requires less
> fiddling/distraction than using a mouse and cursor if you are mostly
> using your hands for the keyboard and real controls ... plus there are
> some types of control that can be done with multi-touch or pen quite
> nicely ... (certainly not knobs, faders and buttons)
Hmm, make the sliders/knobs sitting on the tablet/touchscreen
transparent so the visuals beneath show through?
-- David W. Jones gnome@email-addr-hidden authenticity, honesty, community http://dancingtreefrog.com _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Mon Nov 3 12:15:01 2014
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 03 2014 - 12:15:01 EET