Re: [LAU] Cutting the USB cord :-)

On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Jonathan E. Brickman wrote:

>> Because this is a stage/live setup, I would question
>> using 96k, but trust that you have your reasons.
>
> The 96k is for the highs. I like to have a very gentle feathery timbre
> available in the higher reaches at lower volumes, in strings. The shape
> of the waveform is very crude, if you think about it, at 48k in the
> higher reaches.
>
Some people would dissagree:
http://xiph.org/video/vid2.shtml

>> I am thinking an OPUS
>> link would be advantageous because it may handle dropped packets better
>> than PCM and still has good latency performance.
>
> Had not heard of OPUS. Can you direct me to a reading or three?

Considering what you have said above, you may not like it as it does not
transport anything above 20khz, the native sample rate is 48k.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opus_%28audio_format%29
http://opus-codec.org/

--
Len Ovens
www.ovenwerks.net
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user