Re: [LAU] OM6.9 on Arch

There is now an Arch User package available for OpenMusic:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openmusic/

Cheers,
Daniel

2015-04-06 2:13 GMT+02:00 Daniel Appelt <daniel.appelt@email-addr-hidden>:

> I am sorry to come back only now to this old thread. After my last
> comment, I did some further investigations to get to the root of the
> problem on my system. In the end, neither libtiff nor gdk-pixbuf2 can be
> blamed.
> It seems to be a "packaging problem" specific to Arch's multilib setup. To
> make a long story short, I have filed a bug report:
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/44474
>
> For me, the bottom line is:
>
> - Arch multilib is not perfect. You might have to patch packages that are
> working perfectly on i686 or x86_64 in native mode. A 32bit chroot could be
> an alternative approach, but I have never tried it myself.
> - Having a 32bit only app is not preferable as it might mean lots of extra
> work to make it run in multilib mode on x86_64.
> - Using TIFF images or relying on libtiff in this case is not preferable
> as the library's standard includes are architecture specific.
>
> Cheers, Daniel
>
> 2015-02-15 2:55 GMT+01:00 Simon Wise <simonzwise@email-addr-hidden>:
>
>> On 15/02/15 06:28, David Jones wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 14, 2015 5:48 AM, Len Ovens<len@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2015, anders.vinjar@email-addr-hidden wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The real pain here is having to do 32-bit at all! If we only got lw to
>>>>> consider 64-bit a 'professional' feature, and not just a high-end
>>>>> 'enterprise' feature... :-/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> Even my wife's years-discontinued little netbook is 64-bit.
>>>
>>> With some distros talking about dropping support for 32bit kernels,
>>>> 64bit
>>>> is just where the world is going anymore. 32bit versions are just
>>>> outdated.
>>>>
>>>> As someone who uses old computers for servers etc. I find this
>>>> anoying...
>>>>
>>>
>>> I do wish kernel makers would also stop requiring PAE support. I have a
>>> couple of boxes that don't support PAE.
>>>
>>> Musix is 32-bit only.
>>>
>>> I expect Debian will be producing 32-bit kernels for a good long while
>>> yet. They just seem to change slower than others.
>>>
>>
>> or rather they have made a point of building for many platforms (at least
>> until the recent move to systemd). With systemd they drop their freebsd
>> branch, but also cut off some of the unofficial branches like hurd (systemd
>> can only run on linux ... hence no hurd, no freebsd) and probably lose
>> quite a few of the small embedded systems like raspbian that were based on
>> debian but which becomes much less useful as a base for any small headless
>> systems. It was a very heavily contested decision, fire and brimstone
>> everywhere, but as it ended up a lot of older stuff will drop off over time
>> since adding systemd support won't happen to less used packages.
>>
>> Maybe it was too much to cover everything and still provide a base for
>> ready-to-use distributions, but there is a fork, said to be released when
>> jessie is, and given the need for a system without the huge pile of
>> dependencies on gnome and for some use cases it could well prove long lived
>> ...
>>
>> https://devuan.org/
>>
>> ... time will tell, but it would probably be a much better base for
>> anything simple and custom without a desktop (and without the need to boot
>> quickly as a short term cloud instance).
>>
>> Simon
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-audio-user mailing list
>> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
>> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Apr 9 20:15:01 2015