On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Emanuele Rusconi <emarsk@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> Paul, please be aware that people that uses software to work can be VERY
> conservative, I think it's at the very least understandable and that
> it's a choice that don't deserve to be insulted, especially when the
> transition to A3 is not been so smooth.
>
I've tried to be as clear as I can: if Ardour 2.x works for your workflow
then keep using it as you see fit. But do not suggest that 2.x is somehow a
superior choice for anybody else. To do so is to essentially reduce the
work that many developers have put in over many years to nothing. I am not
insulting people who feel that Ardour 2.x is perfect for them - I am just
unhappy to see it promoted as in any way better than 4.0.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue May 5 00:15:03 2015
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 05 2015 - 00:15:04 EEST