On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, jonetsu@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> Yes, it looks like it is dependant on a specific arch version. In this
> case I installed the 32 dev package and it went OK ... Until it does
> not find -ljack.
That is the one most people have trouble with, you search for the -dev
package and get: libjack-dev. This wants to remove a pile of packages that
depend on jackd2 because the above package is for jackd1. The package to
install is: libjack-jackd2-dev
This is one place where the idea of splitting off the -dev part of a
package does not work well. Jackd and jackd2 should just depend on the
correct -dev package to begin with.
> Now I'm a little bit weary about making the system non functional by
> installing a package that could joyfully remove others. It happened
That is why there is a yes/no prompt in all the good installation tools.
(ie. Not "Software center")
-- Len Ovens www.ovenwerks.net _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Fri Aug 28 00:15:01 2015
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 28 2015 - 00:15:02 EEST