Actually, this is still wrong (as was my comment). JACK1 adds no
latency, and a very small amount of overhead. JACK2 run in its default
mode adds latency, and a very small amount of overhead. JACK2 run in
sync mode discards almost every benefit of using JACK2, adds no
latency and a very small amount of overhead.
I tend to forget this difference between JACK1 and JACK2.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Jeremy Jongepier <jeremy@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On 10/05/2015 01:25 AM, Ben Burdette wrote:
>> I've heard from someone else who seemed to know things that jack does
>> add latency, but I haven't measured it myself... I'd be interested to
>> read about this lack of latency. But latency aside jack can be a
>> monumental hassle, don't get me started.
>
> JACK does not add latency. It does add some overhead, Jack2 some more
> than Jack1, and especially on small ARM dev boards like the bananapi.
> This overhead could get in the way of achieving the lowest latency
> possible compared to using plain ALSA. So if you're using an ARM board
> to output sound from a single application you might be better off using
> plain ALSA.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Oct 5 20:15:02 2015
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 05 2015 - 20:15:02 EEST