Re: [LAU] Jack sample-rate

On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 23:38:38 +0000
Adam Sampson <ats@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> Len Ovens <len@email-addr-hidden> writes:
>
> > That doesn't make sense (but then neither does 96000).
>
> Not for audio, but having JACK run at 96000 Hz is quite useful for
> low-cost software-defined radio...
>
Oh come on now. You surely don't expect to get away with that :)

Explain.... please.

-- 
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user