On 12/12/2015 16:07, Paul Davis wrote:
[...]
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Filipe Coelho <falktx@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> But yeah, since this was something that JACK was not designed for,
>> *all* major clients that exist right now do not support this.
>>
> it wasn't just that it "wasn't designed for". we explicitly discussed it
> and decided that the mere possibility of a changing SR imposed too much
> of a burden on clients.
>
> i still don't know, in retrospect, if this was a correct analysis.
>
Out of curiosity, what would have been the possible use case(s) for
actually supporting this at Jack level?
Lorenzo.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Dec 14 16:15:02 2015
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 14 2015 - 16:15:02 EET