On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 06:55:18PM +0100, Louigi Verona wrote:
> Thanks for your feedback, Fons.
>
> I actually approached it differently. To me the important thing was not to
> "quote Fons", but to quote something that I observed as a common sentiment.
> Next time I will rephrase it, I have no intention to quote you specifically.
But you did, presenting my words in way that made them look hilarious and
you audience ask 'who wrote *that* ?!".
> You mention that the first part (I assume the first sentence in the
> paragraph) is part of the wider discussion. I have read that discussion
> and actually have participated in it.
You and I know the context, and hence how to understand what I wrote.
Your audience doesn't.
> You then mention that 'the right ones' is in single quotes. Can you
> expand on what those quotes mean?
They suggest strongly that I think that something like 'the right ideas'
may not even exist. That there may be different and incompatible ways of
doing things, and that consequently a developer and users may disagree
without either of them being right or wrong.
Ciao,
-- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Wed Dec 23 00:15:01 2015
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 23 2015 - 00:15:01 EET