On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 02:41:24PM +0200, Set Hallstrom wrote:
> On 2016-06-17 14:23, cbannister@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> > Hint: It'll be way more than 16 people, I can think of at least
> > 5 people *I know* who are not on facebook ..
>
> Well, as soon as someone uploads a foto of these 5 people their facial
> recognition data is linked in the graph. Every time i give my phone
> number to someone who's agreed to let facebook upload its contacts to
> the database, i'm a linked to them in the graph. Being "on" facebook
> reaches far beyond opening an account.
Good point! :(
> There might be a non-human readable name attached to my facebook ID, all
> that prevents someone from abusing that data (translate my non-human
> readable ID to my real name) are moral-barriers.
Then we're all doomed!! :(
Yeah, it's amazing how little data you need to do that.
> On 2016-06-16 23:21, worik wrote:
Huh? Isn't it easier to keep track of posts if you reply to
each message separately?
This could turn out to be a real Dog's Breakfast if worik decides to
reply to your message and top posts while doing so.
-- The media's the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power. -- Malcolm X _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Sat Jun 18 20:15:01 2016
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jun 18 2016 - 20:15:01 EEST