On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:46:34PM -0400, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
> Given in my case I am not concerned with mangling the audio (it is
> not intended to be played back, only used to calculate TDOA between
> mics), I have no reservations towards resorting to destructive kinds
> of processing as long as it improves my ability to identify accurate
> TDOA between multiple mics.
But earlier:
> >>Does anyone have access to an easy to implement (as in code)
> >>dereverberation algorithm assuming one has access to the room impulse
> >>response? I am looking for a way to clean-up recorded audio signal in
> >>order to improve signal clarity (e.g. speech).
So now I'm a bit confused... Do you need improved audio, or just
signal statistics ???
Ciao,
-- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Thu Sep 15 00:15:01 2016
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 15 2016 - 00:15:01 EEST