Re: [LAU] The future of audio plugins ?

From: Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Oct 19 2016 - 00:28:37 EEST

let me offer you a hint.

what the plugins need to share are not messages but computer (analysis)
data.

normally (though not universally), when entities run inside a single
process and need to share information, they do so by sharing access to
memory.

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:58 PM, jonetsu <jonetsu@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:45:10 -0400
> Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:35 PM, jonetsu <jonetsu@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > > I disagree on that, based on so many protocols existing out there
> > > that are not proprietary, that can be used openly.
>
> > It isn't about the existence of protocols, it's about the complexity
> > of doing this via protocols at all.
>
> Well, if one uses OSPF to try to do VRRP...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Oct 19 04:15:02 2016

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 19 2016 - 04:15:02 EEST