Re: [LAU] The future of audio plugins ?

On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:28:37 -0400
Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> let me offer you a hint.

Good !

> what the plugins need to share are not messages but computer
> (analysis) data.

So much for the hint.
 
> normally (though not universally), when entities run inside a single
> process and need to share information, they do so by sharing access to
> memory.

This is writing to say nothing. You are going down on choosing the
size and type of bolts when the discussion is obviously at a much
higher, general level.

You have out forward your level of expertise a few times in a few
exchanges in various places.

I will not do likewise, sorry.

> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:58 PM, jonetsu <jonetsu@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:45:10 -0400
> > Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:35 PM, jonetsu <jonetsu@email-addr-hidden>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > I disagree on that, based on so many protocols existing out
> > > > there that are not proprietary, that can be used openly.
> >
> > > It isn't about the existence of protocols, it's about the
> > > complexity of doing this via protocols at all.
> >
> > Well, if one uses OSPF to try to do VRRP...
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Oct 19 04:15:02 2016