Re: [LAU] The future of audio plugins ?

From: jonetsu <jonetsu@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Oct 19 2016 - 20:28:19 EEST

On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:54:33 +0200
Tito Latini <tito.01beta@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> The "artistic" sensibility is difficult to simulate (also for humans),
> however I think that robot is probably a friendly (*) assistant for a
> person without experience.

Not necessarily. There are basic tasks, mentioned here in this thread,
that could be setup *as a framework for further adjustments* in
professional studios.
 
> A simple case: the human requires a mix without to use equalizers or
> dynamics processing. The robot knows the style of the music a priori
> or it is able to discover the musical genre. If the robot works fine,
> the human get a decent automatic mix and, possibly, some suggestions
> about applicable EQ, dynamics processing, re-record some tracks, the
> alternative mic to use, etc. The human asks to apply some DSP, the
> robot provides a new mix, etc..

It 'sounds' way too much like candy coating in this way.

> (*) "ha un cuore di bambino che non si rompe ma a a i"

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDzieioM05g

OTOH, it can be done.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAft2iDKix4

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Oct 20 00:15:02 2016

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 20 2016 - 00:15:02 EEST