Re: [LAU] The future of audio plugins ?

From: Nicklas Ö <no_85@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Oct 21 2016 - 15:14:02 EEST

Have not yet tried but what Ive read atleast nebula needs proper gainstaging because of non linear (in regards to level) processing of signal. Cannot swear on it but would guess atleast some other modeling plugings share similar approach.

Anybody know if convolution reverbs treat signal in a non linear manner, and if its strictly internal processing or if multiple impulse responses could be utilized? Would be fun to experiment with morphing verbs.

Also, please excuse a nubes ignorance,
/n

> On 20 okt 2016, at 20:58, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@email-addr-hidden-dsl.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:44:39 -0400, jonetsu wrote:
>> And this comes from famous consoles used since the 70s.
>
> Pff, DAWs in the 70s? You only need to trim for the analog domain. I
> don't know what and why mixbus provides, perhaps they add a feature to
> attenuate or boost a signal, but adjustment isn't required. There is
> nothing like line level required, because it is not analog. You seem
> not to understand what a trim pot is good for, when using analog mixers.
> A trim pot for DAW mixers could make sense, if a signal should be too
> silent, while the fader is at maximum, but a DAW's mixer doesn't
> require to adjust input levels. This is ridiculous.
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Oct 21 16:15:02 2016

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 21 2016 - 16:15:02 EEST