On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 07:28:08AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> usually those inputs are just designed to fit the impedance,
which is really all that is required. Anything else (EQ, non-
linearity) can be done later in software.
There are different ways to provide a high-Z input. Provided
no signal attenuation is involved things should be OK.
> they are
> not designed to sound good. Such an input does replace an impedance
> converter, such as a DI box or a workaround using a stomp box, but never
> ever those inputs are able to replace a good guitar tube pre-amp.
Quality varies, but guitar preamps are not designed to 'perfect'
(in a technical sense) either. Most will not have a flat response,
add distortion, etc., all that to make the guitar 'sound good'.
Whatever specific frequency response a real guitar preamp will
provide (e.g. due to input capacitance combined with the inductance
of the pickup resulting in some resonance) can be had by classic
EQ as well.
> I might be wrong, but AFAIK those inputs are only provided by pro-sumer
> interfaces and not by professional interfaces, so don't expect
> first-class input amplifiers at all.
Pros will just use a DI-box. Combined with a normal mic preamp
that will provide exactly the same result as a typical high-Z
input - a clean sound without any guitar-specific processing.
Ciao,
-- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Sat May 27 16:15:02 2017
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat May 27 2017 - 16:15:02 EEST