On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 15:16:49 +0000
Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 02:22:58PM +0000, Bill Purvis wrote:
>
>> If there is some cunning
>> way to specify an actual number of cores to be used, then the person who
>> wrote a program which uses that deserves to get lots of flak from people
>> using that program!
>
>Depends on how it's used. For example, Ardour allows you to
>set the number of cores used. The default is 'all but one',
>and that makes perfect sense.
>
>Ciao,
Well, this is all very interesting. Using some of these answers as a
springboard and then doing searches it seems that you can actually assign a
thread to a specific core.
If I've understood that correctly you can also ensure that they are also on the
same socket, which apparently improves memory access.
Not sure what I can do with the information. I shall have to do some more
digging... Anyone got a spare JCB :)
-- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Wed Dec 27 20:15:02 2017
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 27 2017 - 20:15:02 EET