[linux-audio-dev] Re: [CUD] What do we need now ?

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [CUD] What do we need now ?
From: Juhana Sadeharju (kouhia_AT_nic.funet.fi)
Date: ti heinä  27 1999 - 11:25:45 EDT


>From: Dave Phillips <dlphilp_AT_bright.net>
>
> 6. Soundfile editors are still not up to par, although recent advances
>in Snd and MiXViews brings them closer to pro-level software. Simply

Could somebody give a short explanation why Snd and MiXViews should be
considered as pro-level? MiXViews has problems in editing, handling large
files, playing, no plug-ins, and more.

> So what do you think we need ? More organization ? Does anyone else
>feel that there might be too much re-invention of the wheel ? Can we
>coordinate efforts in some better ways ? Let's put it to ourselves: what
>software do we need and how shall we go about getting it ?

I have set up GNU Audio Software Project (GASP) webpages at
"http://www.funet.fi/~kouhia/gasp/". Any matter related to audio software
writing should be documented there: designs, implementation issues,
example codes. Software writers then could look at there and, for example,
take ideas there and save development and/or programming time.

To get an idea about commercial softwares, I have provided there an extensive
listing of software manuals available on the net. If you're interested in
to design GUIs and features, you could download a few best manuals for
getting ideas.

 -*-

In alsa-devel mailing list an other netter announced an audio engine
project last week. I think we need an audio engine so that audio
software development can move to GUI and other non-audio parts of the
software.

Yours,

Juhana


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : pe maalis 10 2000 - 07:25:52 EST