Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Problem and Solution: time
From: Roger Larsson (roger.larsson_AT_norran.net)
Date: ke tammi 12 2000 - 17:38:20 EST
David Olofson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Roger Larsson wrote:
> > There might be a reason to introduce a true pause:
> > 0/f could be interpreted as pause for 1/f second - it would
> > be nice if you are transferring high resolution
> > images... [like a slide show]
>
> If you pause a stream, what happens to the relation to wall clock
> time? I assume the time it starts up again will be related to the
> call/cycle when that happens...? Or; it's the same thing as simply
> disabling the channel when it's not to be used for a while.
>
Something like: No signal change. Use previous data.
But that can be handled by
1/fragment_frequency - with the same buffer pointer every time.
Skip it: it would in fact break the engine.
> //David
>
> .- M u C o S -------------------. .- A u d i a l i t y ----------------.
> | A Free/Open Multimedia | | Rock Solid, Hard Real Time, |
> | Plugin & Integration Standard | | Low Latency Signal Processing |
> `------> www.linuxdj.com/mucos -' `--> www.angelfire.com/or/audiality -'
> .- D a v i d O l o f s o n ------------------------------------------.
> | Audio Hacker, Linux Advocate, Open Source Advocate, Singer/Composer |
> `----------------------------------------------> audiality_AT_swipnet.se -'
-- Home page: http://www.norran.net/nra02596/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : pe maalis 10 2000 - 07:23:26 EST