Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] do YOU support LASDPA? (was Re: Linux Audio plugin API's: where arewe ?)
From: Richard Guenther (richard.guenther_AT_student.uni-tuebingen.de)
Date: Tue Apr 11 2000 - 11:48:43 EEST
On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, David O'Toole wrote:
> I spoke with the GLAME people about some of the technical points; if I
> understand this correctly, LADSPA has a function call for each buffer,
> while GLAME (and OCTAL) give the plugin simultaneous access to all its
> buffers (inputs and outputs) in one function call. This would also
> present a technical hurdle to adding LADSPA compatibility. Am I correct
> in my understanding of how LADSPA does this, or off-base?
Ah, I meant one function call per errr... humm, how do you call this?
Per "iteration" probably. So the inner loop of a plugin is called by
the host for every iteration being able to access all input and output
buffers.
> > I wasn't aware that Buzz support VST plugins. My comment was saying
> > something to the effect of "apparently Buzz users don't see the
> > utility in being able to route Buzz output through some of the cool
> > VST plugins that are out there". Clearly, I'm wrong about this.
>
> There is a lot more real work being done with tracking tools than most
> people realize--the old misconceptions/stereotypes about trackers that I
> still find on the net will probably die hard.
>
> --
> @@@ david o'toole
> @@@ dto_AT_gnu.org
> @@@ www.gnu.org/software/octal
>
-- Richard Guenther <richard.guenther_AT_student.uni-tuebingen.de> WWW: http://www.anatom.uni-tuebingen.de/~richi/ The GLAME Project: http://www.glame.de/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Apr 11 2000 - 12:23:15 EEST