Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa xml gui vs. libvstgui
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Dec 07 2000 - 19:54:13 EET
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 12:43:31PM -0500, Paul Barton-Davis wrote:
> <pushbutton port=33>
> <state value=0 text="First Choice">
> <state value=2 text="Second Choice">
> <state value=99 text="Last Choice">
> </pushbutton>
Thats what I meant, I was thinking of the HTML <OPTION> element.
> specialdigit, this is a set of pixmaps that display digits. you supply
> N pixmaps, presumably 10 (0..9), and its draw() method uses them to
> display the value of the parameter.
Sounds like graphical sugar. It explains how some VST gUI's were built
though.
> >The one thing that would make the XML stuff much better is a way of
> >drawing simple transfer functions, but I can't think of any way of doing
> >it without using a really evil hack, or modifying ladspa.h. I guess its
> >better left to native GUIs.
>
> It would be easy to do, but I can't see any way to pass the data to a
> plugin given that typeof(port) = LADSPA_Data *.
Ah, I was thinking of a transfer function *output* from the plugin,
equally hard though.
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Dec 07 2000 - 20:36:29 EET