Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] some ide qs [was:Re: Interesting article on SCSI vs. IDE]
From: Paul Barton-Davis (pbd_AT_Op.Net)
Date: Thu Nov 09 2000 - 16:38:19 EET
>> in general is irrelevant for the DAW scenario:that people today can
>> regularly and fairly easily get 40-60 tracks from Windows98+ATA100,
>> and that there is simply almost never any need for more tracks than
>> that.
<
>I couldn't imagine so far, that this is possible, and under
>Windows... Isn't that sad? Doesn't it mean it will be even harder
>for a the Windows people to switch to Linux? Is the only obvious
>advantage then the latency issue, one has?
* No Blue Screen of Death.
* Anyone can work on the software to extend it and/or fix it.
* Anyone can learn from/reuse the software.
* Cost-free software.
* Standards.
* Kludge-free OS design.
* We're Hip. We're Cool. I'm Kidding.
>Sad, sad.
Excited, excited.
--p (still wondering if FAT32 is a better filesystem for audio than ext2)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Nov 09 2000 - 17:18:28 EET