Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: proposed initial DTD for LADSPA-gui-xml .. licensing issues ...
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Nov 27 2000 - 13:36:46 EET
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 09:09:22PM -0000, Richard W.E. Furse wrote:
> BTW, I like the sound of the Paul's LADSPA XML GUI spec (although I'm no
> XML expert). I have a suspicion that it will not suffice as a long-term
> general-purpose do-everything GUI for LADSPA, but I don't think it has to
> be seen in this way. It certainly does much good and no harm, as long as we
> can find a safe way to glue it on to the existing LADSPA standard (if this
> is necessary at all). I need to put some thought into this before
> commenting further...
If we map the plugin foo.so -> foo.xml interface description then we
don't need to modify LADSPA at all.
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Nov 27 2000 - 14:43:21 EET