Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Low Latency Kernel Combos
From: Robert Jonsson (robert.jonsson_AT_dataductus.se)
Date: Fri Jun 01 2001 - 23:52:34 EEST
Benno Senoner wrote:
> > > The lowlatency patch helps but does not guarantee that the apps will be
> > > glitch-free, even if you run both apps in realtime mode.
> > > The apps must be designed to take advantage of low latency and unfortunately
> > > most of the existing ones are not.
> >
> > Does the scheduling algorithm survive if you invoke another application with
> > execv?
>
> what do you mean with "survive" ?
> Do you mean if the execv'ed process inherits the SCHED_FIFO scheduling ?
> yes. (I'm only 99.99% sure so if I did say nonsense correct me please)
That is what I meant, I think that is kind of interesting... to tired to
elaborate...sleep is a luxury ;-)...
>
>
> Robert (as everyone on this list) I'd like you to speak out too on the future
> LAD portal issues. (see my other mail VOTE)
Sorry, I'm only keeping half an eye on matters like these.
Anyways, i would really like a "nicer" site under www.linuxaudiodev.com. More of
everything I guess.
More dynamic possibilities...-reply-enabled news section for instance. Though the
mailinglist is perfect for myself, I would think casual viewers would prefer the
pull model.
/Robert
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Jun 02 2001 - 01:47:21 EEST