Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ??

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA proposal, part ??
From: Paul Davis (pbd_AT_Op.Net)
Date: Fri Jun 08 2001 - 00:18:35 EEST


>> yep. as described in the comment for audioengine_port_register(), if
>> the port type is not a builtin, then a buffer must be provided as the
>> 4th argument. i should also have documented that PortIsMulti is
>> illegal for such ports (to ensure 1:1 connections at all times, for
>> reasons documented in previous discussions).
>
>I was going to object to this, but after some thought I don't think it
>matters.
>
>I'm still not clear on where the plugin gets the memory from though,
>how does the plugin request a buffer from the host?

an excellent point. scratch the requirement mentioned above. it has to
provide the size of the buffer in bytes ... :)

--p


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Jun 08 2001 - 02:47:54 EEST