Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] The intel C compiler
From: Richard C. Burnett (burnett_AT_tality.com)
Date: Wed Feb 20 2002 - 22:40:43 EET
I totally agree. I am so tired of everything being rated to the clock
speed of the CPU, which really has no relevence other than comparing it to
the same architecture at different speeds. I say we start measuring speed
by cost/robust-benchmark :)
Rick
> Saying the code runs faster than on an "equivalent"
> Intel processor requires that we agree on what
> equivalent means, a discussion that I suspect won't
> benefit this email list. (Equivalent process
> technologies? Equivalent clock rates? Equivalent
> aggregate performance? Equivalent product intro dates?) -
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Feb 20 2002 - 22:28:51 EET