Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] FREENIX paper about scheduling latency and stuff
From: Roger Larsson (roger.larsson_AT_norran.net)
Date: Tue Apr 09 2002 - 02:33:07 EEST
Nice report, nice tool :-)
But not that much data from Windows 2000...
(when things get tough - using disk or network, there
are no data on Windows 2000 - why?
Is it too good or too bad?)
/RogerL
PS
Nice to see that you have not ignored Benno Senoners
latencytest
DS
On måndagen den 8 april 2002 22.49, John Regehr wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm audio-ignorant so I mostly lurk on this list, but I do usually
> follow discussions about scheduling latency and stuff like that.
>
> I thought some members of this list would be interested in a paper I'm
> working on that's going to appear in the FREENIX track at the USENIX
> Technical Conference in June. It's about Hourglass, a user-level tool
> for measuring scheduling behavior. There are some comparisons in the
> paper between some of the different real-time enhanced versions of
> Linux.
>
> There's a draft here:
> http://www.cs.utah.edu/~regehr/hourglass-040802.ps
> http://www.cs.utah.edu/~regehr/hourglass-040802.pdf
>
> The final copy is due in about a week; I thought I'd post a copy now in
> case people find any mistakes, since this will give me the opportunity
> to correct them.
>
> NOTE: This draft will disappear a few days after this message is posted.
> Anyone reading this message in the archives after April 16 2002 should
> instead look for the final version of the paper at the Hourglass site:
>
> http://www.cs.utah.edu/~regehr/hourglass
>
> Thanks,
>
> John Regehr
> Postdoc, School of Computing, University of Utah
-- Roger Larsson Skellefteå Sweden
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Apr 09 2002 - 02:20:15 EEST