Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: linuxaudio.org
From: Marek Peteraj (marpet_AT_naex.sk)
Date: Thu Jan 15 2004 - 00:12:06 EET
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 16:43, Daniel James wrote:
> > The point though, is that
> > some sort of precise *identity* needs to attach to members.
>
> At the moment this is expected to be by nominated representative to
> the management board. If someone is representing a project publically
> and they shouldn't be, then I think that would be fairly obvious.
>
> > I think "project" is too vague and amorphous a term.
>
> I guess libre software projects are amorphous. They aren't
> individuals, or companies, or organisations in the traditional sense.
>
> > I'd strongly recommend holding off
> > the *legal* establishment of any entity until a broader consensus
> > exists.
>
> Quite right.
Agreed.
> linuxaudio.org has no legal status for the time being.
The problem is, in my eyes the term 'linuxaudio' represents linux audio
developers, linux audio users, linux audio projects.
Consortium.linuxaudio.org would then be representing a consortium.
or foundation.linuxaduio.org for that matter.
M
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jan 14 2004 - 22:10:00 EET