Re: Latency indication (was Re: [linux-audio-dev] +momentary, consolidated (ladspa.h.diff))

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: Latency indication (was Re: [linux-audio-dev] +momentary, consolidated (ladspa.h.diff))
From: Alfons Adriaensen (fons.adriaensen_AT_alcatel.be)
Date: Mon Mar 08 2004 - 17:54:59 EET

On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 03:38:17PM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:

> Yes, but we need to think carefully about the name, "_latency" or
> ".latency" might be a better choice, with a note that hosts should ignore
> _/. prefixed ports that they do not understand.

Agreed 100%. Votes++ for _latency. 

-- 
Fons

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Mar 08 2004 - 17:54:35 EET