Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] New LilyPond entry suggestion html snippet
From: Jens M Andreasen (jens.andreasen_AT_chello.se)
Date: Mon Apr 12 2004 - 22:58:59 EEST
On mån, 2004-04-12 at 12:56, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Jens M. Andreasen writes:
-<snip>-
> > compacted:
> -<snipped as well>-
> FWIW, I hate to think that the lack of a good suggestion is the
> bottleneck (if so, I should have made a better one long ago). Maybe I
> don't understand; do you also do content management for the
> linux-sound.org site?
>
No, I am not an editor for any site.
My humble suggestistion (for a release note) still lacks what I called
for in the first place:
What is new and important? Bugfixes? Features? The "catchline" so
to say, the line telling people that it might be worthwhile to update
their system.
What I did with your _summary_ of the project was an attempt to get a
better "flow" and perhaps adding a few keywords like "graphical" for an
unsuspecting audience. I am still not satisfied with what I wrote. It
lacks a sentence near the top indicating "custumor satisfaction"
combined with "developer dedication (for perfection?)"
> > The LilyPond score engine
>
> Please do not `compact' GNU away, esp. as the linux-sound.org page
> also lists shareware (and currently more favourable at that than
> LilyPond, btw.).
I deliberatedly "compacted" away GNU, because .. ehrmm ..
To me GNU is not so very important. If it is to you, I will of course
respect that. It is a non problem.
We are watching "Lilja Forever" on telly at the moment, but I will come
back to you a little later tonight ...
/jens
>
> Jan.
/jens
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Apr 12 2004 - 22:56:05 EEST