Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] OSC for GUI-Engine communication
From: martin rumori (lists_AT_rumori.de)
Date: Tue Jul 27 2004 - 20:34:48 EEST
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 12:33:56PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> >The question is, which implementation is best? All I can find is
> >Steve's liblo, libosc++, and the 'official' OSC kit. What are the
>
> afaik, libosc++ just wraps the sdk distributed by stanford. and that
> sdk is just a total nightmare. the 2nd worst code i have ever
> read. use liblo.
do you mean the sdk distributed by berkeley? if you're speaking about
libOSC++ from stetson university (part of the wiretap project), it
doesn't wrap the berkeley thing. when using the "fraunhofer" branch
from cvs, it comes with some classes wrapping the unix network stuff
(UDP and TCP).
if you don't need bundles, I'd go with liblo, cause it's really
lightweight.
bests,
martin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Jul 27 2004 - 20:44:14 EEST