Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: What Parts of Linux Audio SimplyWork Great?

From: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezmeyer@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Jun 20 2005 - 00:16:58 EEST

El sáb, 18-06-2005 a las 18:34, Lee Revell escribió:
> On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 16:38 +0200, Richard Spindler wrote:
> > Well I think that there is absolutly no border between "Professional"
> > Audio and "Non-Professional" Audio.
> >
> > Just think about it, today you're using mainly xmms to play some
> > ogg-files, but suddenly you become a little creative, und you want to
> > do some drumming with hydrogen. I see no reason why somebody would
> > screw up his whole configuration just because he suddenly switched
> > from beeing a "consumer" to beeing a "professional".
> >
> > So propably jack is the only way out for the desktop :)
>
> FWIW, Linspire (formerly Lindows) have made the same conclusion, and
> their next release will use JACK for all desktop audio.

Well, I'm sadly not a developer, but using GNU/Linux I learnt to promote
it between the w$ users, and I guess we've all have learnt that. Why not
just simply apply the same reasoning to the Linux Audio world?
As a scratch, this is what I will start "preaching" for now on:

* Want audio on GNU/Linux? Use ALSA + jack _directly_.
* Distros like Linspire are already doing it (¿in the same way that Suse
did with ALSA?) Why aren't you??? (in a polite way, of course :-P)
* More stuff like that.

It's simple, and we as a LA* comunity have our contacts with each part
of the libre software world. Just a matter of starting preaching it, I
guess...

Cheers, Damian-

She got her good looks from her father. He's a plastic surgeon. --
Groucho Marx
Received on Mon Jun 20 04:15:11 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 20 2005 - 04:15:14 EEST