On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 00:23 -0500, Paul wrote:
> Are these the threads you are refering to?
>
> 2.6.X, NPTL, SCHED_FIFO and JACK :
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/6/30/104
I was looking for the thread(s) referenced in the above message:
"Because of the recognition by kernel developers that 2.6 does not
perform as well as 2.4+lowlat (the Andrew Morton patches) when it
comes to scheduling latency, most audio developers and users have
remained with 2.4. Recently however, several brave souls have
attempted to test 2.6. The results have been mixed."
Lee
Received on Mon Mar 13 08:15:10 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 13 2006 - 08:15:11 EET