On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 00:34 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 00:23 -0500, Paul wrote:
> > Are these the threads you are refering to?
> >
> > 2.6.X, NPTL, SCHED_FIFO and JACK :
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/6/30/104
>
> I was looking for the thread(s) referenced in the above message:
>
> "Because of the recognition by kernel developers that 2.6 does not
> perform as well as 2.4+lowlat (the Andrew Morton patches) when it
> comes to scheduling latency, most audio developers and users have
> remained with 2.4. Recently however, several brave souls have
> attempted to test 2.6. The results have been mixed."
it doesn't exist. this was based on private communication with morton,
ingo and a couple of other people.
Received on Mon Mar 13 16:15:07 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 13 2006 - 16:15:07 EET