Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA processing: ams, om, ... Anything else?

From: Andrew Gaydenko <a@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Mar 16 2006 - 21:14:08 EET

Unfortunately, in case you have, say, 20-30 different plugin instances
(non-linear connected), cited (nice and known!) apps are not sutable :-(

======= On Thursday 16 March 2006 21:49, Jesse Chappell wrote: =======
On 3/16/06, Andrew Gaydenko <a@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Are there alternatives for 'ams' and 'om'? My problems are:
>
> - 'ams' has not text fields to type-in controls values with needed precision,
> sliders are not sufficient,
> - 'om' engine has too many crashes (I see, it is normal, as the app is under
> development).
>
> Anything else?

Ardour and jack-rack both satisfy your requirements..

jlc
Received on Fri Mar 17 00:15:02 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 17 2006 - 00:15:02 EET