Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA processing: ams, om, ... Anything else?

From: Andrew Gaydenko <a@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Mar 18 2006 - 02:39:34 EET

Dave,

I needed to have quick result in my aufio DIY-ering test, and I have got
it with (among other apps) 'om' - in spite of segfaults :-) Next time I'll
arrange a console side by side with om_gtk window to hook segfault
reason. Now I can add, 'lashd' was running, DSSI scope was used besides
trivial LADSPA plugins like 'sine's, 'Constant', 'amplifier' and so on.

And ... thanks for the app! Be sure, all is right with your magic power
supplier :-)

Andrew

======= On Saturday 18 March 2006 03:21, Dave Robillard wrote: =======
On Thu, 2006-16-03 at 21:26 +0300, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> Are there alternatives for 'ams' and 'om'? My problems are:
[snip]
> - 'om' engine has too many crashes (I see, it is normal, as the app is under
> development).

No, actually engine segfaults are not even remotely close to "normal".

I don't recall any bug reports from you - my magic crystal ball (from
which I derive my psychic powers) must be malfunctioning.

What exactly do you expect, if you don't even report bugs?

-DR-
Received on Sat Mar 18 04:15:07 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 18 2006 - 04:15:07 EET